Abdulaziz, Grossbart & Rudman









Attorneys At Law

HIGHLIGHTS OF
THE CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD
LICENSING COMMITTEE MEETING

Sacramento, CA
August 21, 2008
By: Sam K. Abdulaziz


The Contractors’ State License Board held a Licensing Committee Meeting on Thursday, August 21, 2008, in Sacramento, CA. 

The meeting was chaired by Licensing Committee Chair Ed Lang.  Mr. Lang introduced the newest Board Member and member of the Licensing Committee, Bruce Rust.

Committee Members present were:

Chair, Ed Lang; Eddie Barnes; Matt Kelly; Cynthia Mitchell; and Bruce Rust.

There were no public comments.   

I.                   LICENSING PROGRAM UPDATE 

The Licensing Program Update was presented by Karen Ollinger, Chief of Licensing. 

1.                  License Application Workload 

The average number of applications received per month was an unusual increase in 2004/2005, which was attributed to the fingerprinting requirements which went into affect in 2005.  Once the fingerprinting requirements and the workload thereof was settled, it appears that the workload will flatten out as of this year. 

The total number of applications received in the month of June 2008, was 3,111. 

2.                  Fingerprinting/Criminal Background Unit Update 

Since the fingerprint program began in January 2005, the CSLB had received more than 153,000 transmittals from the Department of Justice.  The CSLB Criminal Background Unit received records of criminal offenders for nearly 24,000 applicants.  That means that the Department of Justice and/or the Federal Bureau of Investigations reported that those individuals had a past criminal conviction.  Through June 2008, the Criminal Background Unite denied 768 applications and issued 416 probationary licenses.   

However, as a result of our wonderful governmental system and lack of a budget, the Licensing Division, like all of the others have had to eliminate temporary help and overtime.   

II.                TESTING DIVISION UPDATE 

1.                  Testing Center Status 

Robert Porter reported on the testing center status.  Prior to the budget freeze, the testing center had reduced the time within which an applicant could take a test to three to four weeks.  However, since the cut in the budget, and a problem with acquiring a new lease, the time will be increased substantially.   

III.             LICENSE REQUIREMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF INTERLOCKING PAVING STONES 

The Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute has requested that the Contractors' State License Board investigate whether an additional specialty classification should be created for their industry.  Contractors who want to install interlocking concrete paving stones are currently placed in the Masonry (C-29) or Concrete-Related services (C-61/D-06).

 The proponents of the additional specialty classification state that there is a lack of interlocking concrete paving installation knowledge tested on CSLB examinations; a rapidly expanding market for the installation of interlocking concrete paving stones; concern regarding uniform licensing qualifications for installers; and unqualified contractors performing residential jobs improperly. 

 The response from the CSLB was that the CSLB classification system is designed to group similar sub-specialty areas together into somewhat heterogeneous groupings.  This creates a manageable number of classification and allows for testing of underlying knowledge that is applicable to many sub-specialties.  The weight of the content area discussed and other content areas of the examination are determined through an occupational analysis.  Every five years, the CSLB performs and occupational analysis of each classification to update the information that is included in the licensing examination.  The CSLB interviews and conducts workshops with licensed contractors who served as “Subject Matter Experts” to identify the tasks that licensed contractors perform and the knowledge that contractors need to know to practice safely and competently.

 Based on this analysis, the Committee denied the request.   

IV.              REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS SECTION 832.45 ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 

At a June Board Meeting, the Executive Committee of the California Sign Association requested that the definition of the C-45/Electrical Sign classification be clarified to eliminate any possible confusion over the scope of the work for this license category.  This matter was referred to the Licensing Committee. 

The issue was that some public agencies would not allow a C-45 classification to bid on public contracts for all types of sign installation.  This resulted in an interpretation that they could only do electrical signs.  Further, the awarding authority does not realize the limitations of the C-61/D-42 classification or the full capabilities of the C-45 classification. 

The Licensing Committee has recommended to the Board a Regulatory Change to amend the Title and Description of the C-45 classification and changing the Title and Description of the C-61/D-42 classification.   

The following is the Licensing Committee’s recommendation to the full Board: 

C-45 – Sign Contractor

A sign contractor fabricates and installs electric and non-electrical signs, including but not limited to: post or pole supported signs, signs attached to structures, painted wall signs and modifications to existing signs.   

C-61 – Limited Specialty

D-42 – Non-Electrical Sign Installation

A non-electrical sign installation contractor fabricates and installs all types of non-electrical signs, including but not limited to: post or pole supported signs, signs attached to structures, painted wall signs and modifications to existing signs. 

 

V.                 REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT OF ACTION PLAN FOR 2008-09 STRATEGIC PLAN 

The Strategic Plan of the Licensing Committee and its goals are as follows: 

1.      Add a photo ID to the Home Improvement Salesperson pocket license

July 2009

2.      Reestablish e-mail unit in the Licensing Division

July 2009

3.      Create new dedicated bilingual positions in Licensing Information Center

July 2009

4.      Revise pocket license and wall certificates

July 2009

5.      Increase exam seating by expanding Fresno and San Diego testing sites

October 2010

6.      Improve candidate identification at testing centers

October 2009

7.      Implement the DCA on-line licensure tool for credit card payment

July 2012

8.      Implement on-line license exam scheduling tool after DCA iLicensing is implemented

July 2013

 

                                                                                                                       Back to Index


The information and comments throughout this website are intended to be of a general nature. Our comments/advice should not be relied upon without your seeking the aid and advice of legal counsel who will have the opportunity to take the time to research all your issues.

Abdulaziz, Grossbart & Rudman provides this information as a service to its friends & clients. It is of a general nature and should not be used as a substitute for specific legal advice. Any and all information set forth on our website relates solely to California law. The information is not relevant and not applicable in any other state or jurisdiction.


The firm can be reached at:
Abdulaziz, Grossbart & Rudman
P.O. Box 15458
North Hollywood, CA 91615-5458
(818) 760-2000
Facsimile (818) 760-3908 or by E-Mail at Info@AGRLaw.net

Please note that any information you provide to us via e-mail may be viewed by others and therefore, it is not a privileged communication.


Copyright © 2006 by Abdulaziz, Grossbart & Rudman. All rights reserved.
Site Designed & Hosted by
Webtrix Designs