The Contractors’ State License Board
held two Committee Meetings on Friday, August 29, 2008, in Sacramento, CA.
The meetings were the Enforcement Committee and the Public Affairs
Committee, in that order.
EXECUTIVE ORDER
Registrar Steve Sands addressed the issue of the Governors
Executive Order. Many of the people do not understand its significance.
Quite a few people were laid off. When and if the Executive Order is set
aside, the people laid off will have to reapply. They do not just come back
to work. Further, no one (except the Governor) knows when this will happen
and most significantly, how many will be rehired.
THE BUDGET
Many employees have been laid off and no one knows how
many will be rehired to ease the strain on the present CSLB workload.
PARTNERSHIPS
The CSLB staff has done such a good job both in its sting
operations, publicizing their operations and making significant in roads,
that the CSLB has been able to partner with many other entities in public
protection.
Both
Committees’ have done outstanding jobs in their respective Committees.
David Fogt (Enforcement) and Rick Lopes (Public Affairs) have exceeded
expectations. As you will see from each specific Committee Meeting, there
is very little left to be said other than “Great Job!”
I.
ENFORCEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
The following Committee Members were present:
Chair, Bob Lamb; Louise Kirkbride; Ed Lang; and new Board
Member, Bruce Rust.
Steve Matich was the only Committee Member absent.
1.
Public Comment Session
There were no Public comments.
2.
Intake and Mediation Centers
As stated previously, David Fogt, the Chief of Enforcement,
has put together a very potent group with respect to consumer protection.
The following are only some highlights.
During July of 2008, the Intake and Mediation Centers
obtained $676,281.24 in restitution for California Consumers.
These results should stand on its own. However that would be somewhat
unfair because others may not understand how much work is being done to
achieve these results.
Some of the highlights of the cases are as follows:
A Consumer Services Representative convinced a subcontractor
to refund all monies paid totaling $10,580.00 and a new complaint was opened
against the general contractor and referred to the field for investigation.
The complainant started off dealing with both the subcontractor and general
contractor, but specifically dealt with the subcontractor for delivery and
installation of tile. Somehow, the general contractor picked up the tile
and had it installed at a different jobsite.
Another subcontractor had a contract with a general
contractor to install flooring in several homes. The job was completed but
the subcontractor was still owed $20,273.46. A Consumer Services
Representative was able to negotiate an agreement for a payment schedule
until the amount owed to the subcontractor was paid in full.
A Consumer Services Representative obtained a full refund for
installation of a leaky roof. The total amount paid to the contractor was
$18,476.00. The CSLB was able to negotiate a complete refund of the monies
paid to the homeowner.
In a very small complaint, a contractor agreed to go back and
replace an off-white piece of skirting with a white piece at a $4.00 savings
to the public.
3.
Reduction of Aged Complaints
In July of 2005, there were 556 complaints pending that
were 60 days in age or older. Through effective supervision, training,
mentoring, and monitoring, the intake and mediation center has reduced the
number of pending complaints to an all-time low of 28 complaints aged 60
days or older state wide.
The Sacramento
Intake and Mediation Center set a new record at zero complaints over 60
days old.
4.
Investigative Center
The Investigative Center provided examples of five criminal
convictions. In the first one, they received a complaint for a project
wherein the work was done without a license at a cost of $12,000.00. The
case was referred to the Stanislaus County District Attorneys Office for
violation of diversion of construction funds and contracting without a
license. The unlicensed contractor was sentenced to serve 120 days in jail,
pay $4,800.00 in restitution, and was placed on five years formal
probation. In addition, he was ordered not to contract without a license
and restitution payments will be paid through the Stanislaus County
Probation Department to the victims.
In a second case, a lady who had just moved to Redding from
Arizona began convincing customers that she and her husband were about to
become pool and landscape contractors. Two victims were duped into entering
into contracts with unlicensed people who had not even applied for a license
in California. One of the victims had paid a total of $28,200.00 on the
project, much of it up front. The workmanship was substandard.
Another senior complaint was referred to the District Attorney as a result
of the estimate given to correct the project, much of it up front. The
alleged contractor plead guilty to one felony count of misuse of
construction funds, elder abuse, and a misdemeanor count of contracting
without a license. The unlicensed contractor was also ordered to pay
restitution to both victims.
Yet another contractor made false or fraudulent statements to
reduce workers’ compensation insurance premiums. For several years, he had
misreported his company’s payroll in order to secure lower workers’
compensation insurance premiums. In addition, a lead prosecuting Deputy
Attorney General handled a criminal case to determine the viability of a
simultaneous administrative action. The result was that the bad guy was
ordered to pay $50,000.00 in restitution and will serve 60 days in jail. He
also agreed to a suspension of his contractor’s license and will be on
probation for three years.
Another unlicensed contractor entered into a contract in June
with a consumer to construct retaining walls on a driveway. He obtained
payments totaling $41,500.00 and performed very little work, having diverted
most of the money for his personal use. The consumer filed a complaint with
the CSLB. The unlicensed contractor was formally sentenced to serve 60 days
in jail and to pay $37,500.00 in restitution.
Multiple complaints were received against Jorge Lopez, the
sole owner of a contractor’s license. The contractor performed some work,
although done very poorly, for two of his victims and received large down
payments without performing any work for two additional victims. It became
clear to one homeowner that some of the money was going to be used for the
personal use of the contractor. He stated that he needed approximately
$20,000.00 to pay the IRS. The San Francisco District Attorney’s Office was
also involved in the criminal prosecution, which resulted in the filing of a
felony criminal complaint. Lopez was convicted of theft by diversion of
construction funds and was sentenced to probation for three years and was
ordered to pay $42,000.00 in restitution with interest at 10% from the date
of the crime.
5.
High Profile Investigations
A consumer purchased a log cabin kit home from a reputable
manufacturer and was provided with a video. The consumer could not put the
log cabin home together himself. He entered into a written contract with an
unlicensed contractor to assemble the log cabin kit for $30,800 including
tools and labor. The unlicensed contractor was issued a citation for
contracting without a license. However, it appears that there is more to
come.
6.
Enforcement Priorities
The CSLB has come up with the following enforcement
investigative priorities to try and provide the highest level of consumer
protection with their limited resources:
1.
Identifying and investigating contractors
engaged in criminal activity with intent to cause significant harm to
California consumers;
2.
Health and Safety complaints, relating to
unsafe construction practices;
3.
Elder Abuse;
4.
Investigating consumer-initiated complaints
against unlicensed contractors;
5.
Triaging and mediating licensee complaints to
protect the integrity of the construction industry;
6.
Partnering with other state agencies to address
workers’ compensation, tax law violations, and employee safety concerns;
7.
Conducting sting operations in response to
industry leads for such things as building departments, construction
industry associations, district attorneys and licensed contractors;
8.
Responding to leads if certain criteria is
provided, such as site location/estimated duration of project, information
available on suspect, photos of workers and/or work vehicles, type of
violation;
9.
Establishing a presence in the field.
7.
Complaint Handling Statistics
Complaints have remained manageable and constant throughout
the 2008 calendar year. Enforcement started the year in January with 4,516
complaints and as of July 31, 2008, there are 4,577 complaints. This work
is awesome given the fact that Enforcement had many fewer people doing the
work.
On Aged Cases, the Board continues to exceed their
established goal of 100 complaints. The majority of the aged complaints
stem from offices that have suffered supervisor vacancies. The Enforcement
Division anticipates that the Governor’s Executive Order will have a
significant impact on cycle times due to enforcement loss of retired
annuitants. However, complaints over 60 days in age in the Intake and
Mediation section have decreased to just 27 complaints.
Production of the Enforcement Representatives continues to be
going very well.
The Attorney General Costs in the 2007/08 fiscal year, were
contained at $4,441,864 compared to the budgeted amount of $4,896,370. CSLB
realized a savings of approximately $450,000.
8.
Partnering with Law Enforcement
The CSLB continues to work closely with law enforcement
agencies throughout the state to target illegal activity and discuss
enforcement strategies to combat that activity. The Enforcement Committee
recently met with the staff from Butte County District Attorney’s office and
the Mariposa County District Attorney’s office to discuss joint enforcement
activities to protect homeowners in those areas following the recent
wildfires. The Los Angeles City Attorney’s office continues to refer all
matters involving unlicensed contractors to the CSLB.
SWIFT personnel and investigative supervisors and enforcement
representatives met with Deputy District Attorney David McDonald from the
Ventura County District Attorney’s office. Mr. McDonald was recently
assigned to reviewing and handling CSLB criminal cases.
a.
Rocky Delgadillo, Los Angeles City Attorney
Rocky Delgadillo spoke at the Annual Legislative Conference of the
Construction Industry Legislative Council. He was honored for his efforts
to combat unlicensed contractors. Mr. Delgadillo linked the rise in
unlicensed contractors to membership in street gangs. The “new organized
crime…coming to a neighborhood near you.”
As an aside, he interrupted my presentation.
b.
Sweeps and Stings
Following is a list of law enforcement and government agencies that
participated in CSLB sweeps and stings conducted in May, June and July,
2008, they include:
Riverside County District Attorney’s Office, Palm Springs
Police Department, Department of Insurance, Monterey County District
Attorney’s Office, California Department of Justice, Employment Development
Department, Department of Labor Standards Enforcement, Calaveras County
District Attorney’s Office, Santa Cruz County District Attorney’s Office,
Department of Toxic Substances Control, City of Corona Building Department,
Fort Bragg Police Department, Tulare County District Attorney’s Office,
Department of Labor.
c.
Criminal Investigation Task Force
As
the Criminal Investigation Task Force winds up its investigation of
fraudulent service and repair contractors, another group of predatory
contractors is appearing on CSLB’s radar: Telemarketing contractors.
In August 2005 CSLB revoked the licenses of four contractors
who were involved in telemarketing scams that targeted the elderly with
considerable equity in their homes. Among the elderly was an 88 year old
woman who was duped into signing a $65,000 loan that was secured against her
home.
Often, projects are performed without permits to avoid inspection.
After too many complaints are filed against the telemarketing
contractor’s license, the fraudulent contractor will abandon the license
leaving numerous victims with unfinished, substandard work and major
financial injuries. The predators then move on to “borrow” another license
to continue with the scam.
Enforcement considers these telemarketing contractors to be a
serious threat to consumers. Alerts have been placed in the newsletters
that have been mailed to licensees to warn them of the repercussions that
they may face if they illegally “rent” out their licenses.
d.
Criminal Convictions
Arthur Hunter/RAN Construction plead “no contest” to felony
diversion of construction funds. He was sentenced to 60 days in county
jail, placed on court probation for three years and ordered to pay $110,000
in restitution.
Mark Steven Stalder plead no contest and was convicted on
felony charges of fraudulent use of a contractors’ license and misdemeanor
charges of contracting without a license in Stanislaus County. He was
sentenced to five years formal probation, 210 days in jail, and ordered to
pay restitution to his victims and submit to searches for forged or
fraudulent documents.
Jonathan Aaron Teague plead guilty and was convicted on
charges of felony diversion of funds, felony use of a contractor’s license,
and misdemeanor contracting without a license. He was sentenced to 180 days
in Placer County Jail, three years probation, $4,000 in restitution, and
$5,000 in fines.
Timothy Andrew Schaeffer was an unlicensed contractor doing
business as Dynamic Design Systems and was arrested on an outstanding
warrant stemming from a CSLB investigation. He faces felony charges of
grand theft and diversion of construction funds, as well as misdemeanor
charges of contracting without a license. He took $86,683 from an Army
National Guard Master Sergeant and his wife to perform a major home remodel
project. On July 22, 2008, Schaffer pled guilty to grand theft charges and
faces three years in prison, restitution to his victims, and a fine of
$10,000.
e.
Summer Wildfire Response
The
CSLB has responded significantly to the summer wildfire responses as
previously pointed out in these Highlights. Included in their response were
various sweeps, stings and site visits.
A
presentation was made by Rick Villucci, Senior Investigator, State Wide
Investigative Fraud Team that was very informative. Villucci reported on
how SWIFT has partnered with just about every other possible agency in the
consumer protection area, including bonding companies to help the many
homeowners that were devastated by the wildfires.
9.
Partnering With Industry Associations
The
Contractors’ State License Board has started partnering with industry
associations. CSLB Registrar, Steve Sands and CSLB Enforcement Chief, David
Fogt, met with industry association representative to discuss partnering to
enhance enforcement. The CSLB has developed a new speaker request card to
industry association representatives. Completed cards are mailed to the
enforcement division where staff coordinates speaker scheduling for the
associations next meetings.
The CSLB looks forward to working with construction industry associates to
combat illegal construction activity.
10.
Partnering With State Agencies
The
CSLB is partnering with various law enforcement entities. They have also
entered into Memoranda of Understanding with various other parties such as
the Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and
Health, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards
Enforcement, Department Industrial Relations, Office of the Director Legal
Unit, and the Employment Development Department.
11.
Review And Development Of Action Plan
For 2008-2009 Strategic Plan
The
goal of the Enforcement Action Plan is to reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unlicensed activity and unprofessional conduct that pose a threat to public
health, safety, and welfare. The objectives are as follows:
1.
To develop criteria for reactive complaint
enforcement to maximize effectiveness with current resources;
2.
Perform an Enforcement and Case Management
program analysis;
3.
Establish a new investigative center in the
Santa Clarita Valley;
4.
Develop a new electronic mechanism for the
public to report violators;
5.
Develop a multi-agency template for complaint
reporting and feedback;
6.
Develop web-based tools for agencies that award
contracts and report violators.
Each
of these objectives includes an action plan to deal with the specific
violation.
All in all the CSLB has shown its credibility to the various public agencies
and it is getting much easier to file cases with various other counties.
Indeed Alameda used to go after violent crimes only. That is no longer the
case.
As
anyone can see, the Enforcement Committee, under the tutorship of David Fogt,
is doing a wonderful job with limited resources.
II.
PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE MEETING
The following Committee Members were present:
Chair, Bob Brown; Louise Kirkbride; Bob Lamb; Lisa Miller-Strunk;
and Joan Hancock – by telephone.
The were no absent Committee Members.
1.
Public Comment Session
There were no Public comments.
2.
General Comment
Rick Lopes introduced his staff
including Maria Kennedy who everyone knows. She is also a wonderful
advocate for consumer protection.
The Public Affairs Office is very, very busy and productive.
The Public Affairs Office is responsible for public, industry and media
relations for the Board. The Public Affairs Office provides a wide range of
services including proactive media and advertising campaigns; responses to
media inquirers; community outreach including seminars, special events and
speeches to services groups and/or organizations; publications and
newsletter development and distribution; and contractor education and
outreach. Rick Lopes of Public Affairs is very busy and good at his job in
working for the Board.
Some of the information in the Public Affairs packet is
duplicative to information provided in the Enforcements Committee’s
package. Accordingly, Mr. Lopes did not report on the duplicative items.
EXECUTIVE ORDER S-09-08
On July 31, 2008, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed
Executive Order S-09-08. This Executive Order led to the termination of an
estimated 10,300 temporary workers. It also suspended all contracts, banned
overtime, froze state hiring and reduced pay for about 200,000 state workers
to the federal minimum wage of $6.55 per hour to preserve cash in the midst
of a prolonged budget impasse.
The order is having a significant impact on Public Affairs
Office (PAO) operations. First, PAO was forced to lay off two people, one
Retired Annuitant and one Student Assistant. In addition, the contract for
advertising/public relations services with Astone/Crocker/Flanagan has been
suspended. Below is a closer look at the program impact and effects on
PAO’s Strategic Plan:
PROGRAM
IMPACT
1.
Suspension of Consumer Media Awareness Campaign
2.
Suspension of Consumer & Licensee Research
Program
3.
Suspension of Disaster Victim Interactive Video
Production
4.
Suspension of Partnership Program
5.
Suspension of Special Events Program targeting
low-income & multicultural audiences
6.
Elimination of Employee Wellness Program
EFFECT
ON STRATEGIC PLAN
1.
Inability to complete item #2 (from Program
Impact section above)
Conduct statewide consumer and contractor research
2.
Limited ability to complete item #3 (from
Program Impact section above)
Identify new goals for Web site
3.
Inability to complete item #4 (from Program
Impact section above)
Develop partnerships to expand educational outreach.
4.
Inability to complete item #6 (from Program
Impact section above)
Implement an expanded public information campaign focused on
the risks of hiring unlicensed operators.
In addition, until a new state budget is passed, spending
authorization and travel reimbursements are halted. Therefore, PAO, is only
conducting Senior Scam Stopper events within a short driving distance to
Sacramento and utilizing various CSLB staff for outreach appearances in
other parts of the state.
MEDIA
OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AWARENESS CAMPAIGN SUMMARY
The PAO continues its policy of aggressively distributing
press releases to the media, especially to publicize enforcement actions and
undercover sting operations.
PRESS
RELEASES
The CSLB issued six media releases dealing with stings,
wildfires, and other charges. They also conducted press events of sting
operations along with four media outlets.
MEDIA
RELATIONS
Between June 1, 2008 and August 15, 2008 PAO staff responded
to more than 65 separate media inquirers and provided interviews to a
variety of newspaper, radio and television outlets. They conducted, along
with enforcement, undercover sting operations. They continue its program of
alerting industry members to news of importance and interest by distributing
industry bulletins. They continue to distribute monthly “Ask The Board”
articles in both English and Spanish to newspapers in and around
California.
CSLB PUBLICATIONS
Despite the
state budget impasse, the Public Affairs Office is continuing its goal of
providing educational materials to consumers through a concerted internal
campaign to update all CSLB publications.
Currently in
various stages of approval, production or printing are:
What Seniors
Should Know Before Hiring a Contractor – brochure – Spanish
What You
Should Know Before Hiring a Contractor – brochure – Spanish
Preventing
Mechanic’s Liens – brochure – Spanish
Tips For
Hiring a Roofing Contractor – brochure – Spanish
Tips For
Hiring a Roofing Contractor – brochure – English
10 Tips For
Making Sure Your Contractor Measurers Up – Card – English/Spanish
A Consumer
Guide to Filing Consumer Complaints – brochure – English
After a
Disaster Don’t Get Scammed – brochure-English
Before You
Dive Into Swimming Pool Construction – brochure – English
Blueprint for
Becoming a Licensed Contractor – booklet – English/Spanish
Building
Officials Information Guide – booklet – English
Know Your
Responsibilities as an Owner Builder – brochure – English
The PAO
continues to list seminars.
The CSLB has an
action plan for communication and education. The Public Affairs meets this
goal by :
Informing the
public about the role and function of CSLB;
Educating the
public about their rights and responsibilities in the contracting process;
Educating
contractors about building codes, construction methods, and business
practices; and
Ensuring that contractors
understand their professional obligations and responsibilities.
|
OBJECTIVES |
TARGET DATE |
|
Update and implement Public
Affairs plan through 2009, based on the Board-approved priorities,
input from advertising contractor, and available resources. |
January 2009 |
|
Conduct statewide consumer and
contractor research |
January 2009 |
|
Identify new goals for Web site |
January 2009 |
|
Develop partnerships to expand
educational outreach |
January 2009 |
|
Create a business practice kit
for licensees to help educate consumers |
June 2009 |
|
Implement an expanded public
information campaign focused on the risks of hiring unlicensed
operators |
July 2009 |